Negotiation skills are useful in all walks of life. As they
apply to business, they entail the successful navigation and settlement of the
wants and needs of multiple parties, aka stakeholders. To put it into my own
words, I would say that negotiation is a form of positive conflict resolution in
which the outcome is mutually beneficial for all parties. Successful
negotiation takes a dedication and practiced skill for all of the interpersonal
skills previously discussed on this blog, especially active listening,
non-verbal communication, and situational knowledge.
A new skill that I learned in relation to negotiation skills
is managing argumentativeness versus verbal aggressiveness. Per the textbook Strategic Communication in Business and the
Professions, “An inclination to argue or a fondness for arguing is called
argumentativeness…the tendency to attack other people instead of other points
of view is termed verbal aggressiveness” (O’Hair, Friedrich, & Dixon,
p.323). To find out where I fell on this spectrum, I personally completed the
Argumentativeness Scale and Verbal Aggressiveness Scale Assessments available
in the text. I found that my argumentativeness rating was a -3, corresponding
to a moderate-low level of argumentativeness. My verbal aggressiveness rating
was 15, corresponding to a moderate level of verbal aggressiveness. I learned
from this exercise that I am very much down the middle when it comes to
conflict, and this is true in the sense that I don’t enjoy conflict but also
don’t strive to avoid it. I recognize the benefits of conflict when it is
leveraged constructively, but I am not the type that will argue for the sake of
the art. Mastering negotiation and conflict management skills will help me use
the inevitability of conflict to the greatest advantage.
References
O'Hair, D., Friedrich, G. &
Dixon, L. (2011). Strategic communication
in business and the professions
(7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.